Coronavirus and math lessons


The Denominator Problem

There was an interesting op-ed in the WSJ a couple of days ago (see link below) by Eran Bendavid and Jay Bhattacharya from Stanford. They ask if the cost of a lockdown is perhaps higher than the cost of no lockdown.

The op-ed is behind a pay wall, so I'll provide a summary of their argument.

The authors claim that the commonly assumed coronavirus (CV) death rate of ~1% is inaccurate (i.e. too high) due to the lack of antibody testing to determine the true denominator for the ratio. (The death rate is calculated by dividing the number of deaths, i.e. the numerator, by the number of infected, i.e. the denominator.) In other words, we don't have an accurate count of everyone who has the virus until we do antibody testing of everyone. That's because many people who have the virus develop antibodies and very mild symptoms and never get tested and never get counted as part of the denominator.

I suspect when the they calculate the death rate from the flu (~0.1%) they assume everyone or almost everyone gets the viruses (the flu is actually several different viruses, always mutating every season). So the denominator used for calculating the death rate for the flu is probably 80%-90% of the population. In other words, we're using a much bigger denominator when calculating the death rate from the flu and a much smaller one when calculating the death rate from the coronavirus or the resulting disease known as COVID-19. No wonder we're coming up with a much higher death rate for CV. When we justify a lockdown for CV, it's important to recall that 61,000 people died in the US from the flu last year, and there was no 24/7 news coverage or hysteria or lockdowns.
As I've pointed out before (in other posts/forums), the flu killed 61,000 in the US last year. And we saw barely any coverage of that on the news. Who is to say how many of those deaths were caused by our longstanding inadequate healthcare system with insufficient coverage, beds, healthcare personnel, ventilators, masks, etc. -- all of the things that are getting exposed now only because of the extra attention given to the novel CV because it is novel (new) and we fear what we don't know?

To this I would add, that those without healthcare coverage in this first-world-not-first-world country are highly unlikely to get tested unless they develop serious symptoms or complications. That further erodes the denominator.

(For those who wish to contest my evaluation of the US healthcare system, I'll provide one simple example from first hand experience of working in the healthcare industry. ICD is a worldwide system for coding medical procedures. In 2010, while every first world country was using ICD-11, healthcare organizations in the US were complaining about the cost of upgrading from ICD-9 to ICD-10. ICD-9 was so backward that it could not distinguish between a right kidney procedure and a left kidney procedure. So patients had to hope the medical practitioners wouldn't perform the procedure on the wrong kidney.)

Finally, the authors contend that the lockdown actually kills many poor people who rely on daily wages and cannot survive under lockdown conditions.

I don't think the authors said this, but I can imagine that people with no fixed address may never get their stimulus checks or unemployment checks or get them too late to be of use. And they may have challenges getting to a bank to cash those checks since they're accustomed to direct deposit.

Also, I know many people who have lost their jobs due to the lockdown. And while the paychecks stop immediately, the stimulus checks and unemployment checks take their own sweet time to arrive. That creates an obvious disruption in terms of cash flow. And we know many people don't make enough to have savings or reserves or live the hand-to-mouth lifestyle popularized by our consumerist society. Add to that illegal immigrants who get paid in cash under the table, don't have healthcare coverage, and won't get receiving stimulus checks or unemployment checks. The lockdown will crush some of the most vulnerable members of our society.

As an aside, I ask you to consider this. If social distancing is such a perfect solution, then how do we implement that in old age homes, jails, prisons, and other forms of involuntary confinement?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Milwaukee Appliance Hand Truck

Image
Milwaukee Appliance Hand Truck, leaning against my shed Also known as a cart or a dolly. The model is HDA700. I paid around $120 for it. Here's a list of the features. Wrought iron frame 800 pound load capacity 6 inch non-marking wheels (solid, non-inflatable, never go flat) Stair climbers to help move loads up and down stairs and curbs Padding to prevent the cart from damaging the appliance (this is the white strip in the picture above) Belt or strap that goes around the appliance to secure it to the cart and keep it in place Manual ratchet belt tightener, the buckle-like part at one end of the belt (more on this below) Belt tightener handle (this is the red handle in the picture above) to add more tension to the belt once the manual ratchet has been used to the tighten the belt  I recently used this hand truck to move a big ass 320 pound refrigerator out of my garage (where it was delivered) and up a couple of steps to the deck, up one more step through the doubl...
Read more

My Experiments with the PICAXE 08M2+

Image
PICAXE 08M2+ I generally prefer to do things the hard way. For example, you can either microwave a frozen dinner or cook from scratch. The microwave option is a good backup plan, but cooking from scratch has far too many advantages, as I outlined in a recent blog post on the do-it-yourself way of life. In the electronics and robotics world, the analogy of cooking from scratch is to build circuits using a bare bones micro-controller chip (e.g. the PICAXE ) rather than a fancy board (e.g. the Arduino ). Therefore, once I get a circuit working with the packaged Arduino approach (e.g. this robot I built recently), I usually try to replicate the circuit using more basic components like the PICAXE. My decision to consider the PICAXE was influenced by Charles Platt's coverage of it in his awesome book Make: Electronics . But essentially, I am a minimalist and I want to see how much I can get done with a bare bones chip rather than a bulky board-based micro-controller like the Ar...
Read more

Utility trailer buying guide

Image
Introduction I recently bought a utility trailer . (I'll explain momentarily what that is and why you might consider buying one.) Going through the process (research, preparation, purchase, registration, setup and maintenance) has taught me that it's not a simple endeavor and very little good documentation exists in the public domain (e.g. on the Internet). Hence, this post. Research In dictionary terms, of course, "to trail" means "to follow" (or to trace the path of a primary vehicle). Alternately, Wikipedia defines a trailer as an unpowered vehicle pulled by a powered vehicle. So, let's get acquainted with what a utility trailer is and why you might consider buying one. If you're a hardworking, blue collar American you probably already have one -- it's the back half of your pickup truck . Well not quite, but that's the reason Australians refer to a pickup as a utility vehicle. A pickup is characterized by the presence of a flat...
Read more